🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, but block by block. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of ballots added later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday went kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump previously went for the progressive now. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass half. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he does because then no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. The independent kept very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I think there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. However overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from progressives hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.